Construction News

Sun August 04 2024

Related Information

Asbestos removal: a case study in how NOT to do it

9 Feb 11 No survey, no plan, no risk mitigation measures and hazardous asbestos waste blocking pavements. That was the scene facing health and safety inspectors when they followed up a complaint about demolition work on an old church in Snodland, Kent.

Maidstone Magistrates' Court heard yesterday (8 February) that the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) had received a complaint from a member of the public about demolition works taking place on the corner of Holborough Road in Snodland.

The site was owned by Bernard Berry of Berry Estates Development Ltd that was also carrying out the demolition of the building.

On 23 April 2010, two HSE inspectors visited the site and discovered the majority of the building had already been demolished but debris containing asbestos was blocking the pavement on one side and had also spilled out onto the pavement on the other side.

Mr Berry, who was the principal contractor, could not provide any paperwork such as a demolition plan, method statements or risk assessments. No asbestos survey had been completed prior to the demolition and site security was shoddy. A prohibition notice was served preventing any further work onsite.

After the notice was served Mr Berry commissioned a pre-demolition asbestos survey, which highlighted a number of asbestos containing materials across the site.

An HSE investigation showed that the building was being knocked into pedestrian areas and broken up with an excavator. It showed no evidence of employee training, no personal protection or respiratory equipment and no plan of work on site. It also revealed no provision to prevent dust spreading during demolition and crushing.

Related Information

HSE inspector David Fussell said: "The company failed to take any measures aimed at controlling the workers' exposure to asbestos and reduce any future incidence of related diseases.

"This is a shocking case as it was foreseeable that a building of this age may have had asbestos-containing materials in the building fabric, as the subsequent survey highlighted.

"If the company had carried out a survey and prepared a plan of work prior to demolition, the risk of exposure to the workers onsite or the general public could have been avoided."

Berry Estates Development Limited, of Red Hill, Wateringbury, Maidstone, Kent, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulations 5, 7 and 16 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. It was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3,391.

Bernard Berry, director of the company also pleaded guilty to breaching the same regulations. He was fined £5,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3,391.

Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk

MPU
MPU

Click here to view latest construction news »