Construction News

Sun July 21 2024

Related Information

Load fell because rated capacities were ignored

1 Apr 11 The importance of clearly marking rated capacity on lifting equipment, including slings and chains - and observing them - was highlighted yesterday during a court hearing into a crane accident.

The load that fell onto Mr Burrell's leg
The load that fell onto Mr Burrell's leg

Cheshire motor component manufacturer Mitras Automotive (UK) Ltd was prosecuted by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) following a crane accident caused by an overload. A 31t load fell from an overhead crane at its factory on the Winsford Industrial Estate in Winsford on 21 May 2009, crushing the leg of an employee.

Chester Crown Court heard that Andrew Burrell and two other employees were working the night shift when chains on the overhead crane gave way. Part of the crane was pulled from roof mountings and fell nearly five metres to the ground. The crane's hook landed on Mr Burrell's left leg, shattering his thigh bone.

The 43-year-old from Winsford had to have a metal rod inserted in his leg as a result of his injuries. His two colleagues escaped unharmed.

The subsequent HSE investigation found the chains were only designed to lift a maximum of 17t - barely half the weight of the load - and the crane itself was only rated at 27t capacity.

Mitras Automotive (UK) Ltd admitted failing to ensure the lifting capacity of the chains was clearly marked, and failing to look after the safety of its workers. The company was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £8,792 in prosecution costs on 31 March.

Related Information

Martin Paren, the investigating inspector at HSE, said: "A worker has been badly injured as a result of this completely avoidable incident, but the consequences could easily have been catastrophic. It's incredible no one was killed.

"Mitras regularly expected its workers to lift loads well over the lifting capacities of both the chains and the overhead crane. It was only a matter of time before something went wrong, which is why Mitras Automotive was in court today.

"Lifting capacities exist for a reason and it's vital that manufacturers who use overhead cranes make sure employees aren't put a risk from falling loads."

Mitras Automotive (UK) Ltd was charged with breaching Regulation 7(a) of the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, and Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk

MPU
MPU

Click here to view latest construction news »