An HSE inspector visited a residential property in Alma Road, Plymouth on 16 March 2009 and found several basic safety failings in scaffolding erected by Arthur John Tucker for roofing work. Only one guard rail was found on the working platform that required two, no safety harnesses were used to erect the scaffold and an unsecured scaffold pole was resting on a broken concrete block wall.
HSE served a prohibition notice ordering work to stop and Mr Tucker, who had never had any training in scaffolding, was served with an improvement notice to get trained in scaffolding safety.
But when inspectors later returned to the site, they found that Mr Tucker had ignored the training order and so decided to prosecute.
Mr Tucker, of Skylark Rise, Woolwell, Plymouth pleaded guilty at Plymouth Magistrates Court to contravening the requirements of an improvement notice to provide sufficient training for himself and his employee under Section 33 (1) (g) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. He was given a conditional discharge and ordered to pay £2,108 in costs. The magistrates also ordered Mr Tucker to complete the additional training for himself and his employees within 18 months of the hearing.
After sentencing, HSE inspector Barry Trudgian said: "It is absolutely imperative that scaffolding is erected safely by well trained workers to avoid often catastrophic incidents. Mr Tucker not only illustrated his lack of professionalism when the scaffolding was erected but he then ignored a legal order intended to increase his competence. He has found today that compliance with these notices is compulsory, not optional.”
Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk
